Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Finances

MP Drove Car Worth 8.6 Million, Declared VAZ — HACC Recovered 7.2 Million to State Budget

HACC (High Anti-Corruption Court) recognized three luxury vehicles of People's Deputy Sergiy Lytvynenko ("Servant of the People") as unjustified assets. The cars were registered under unofficial drivers and a related company, while he himself obtained a pass for them to the Verkhovna Rada.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

May 15, 2026 · 2 min read

MP Drove Car Worth 8.6 Million, Declared VAZ — HACC Recovered 7.2 Million to State Budget
Фото: depositphotos.com

On May 14, a panel of judges of the Supreme Anti-Corruption Court satisfied a lawsuit filed by the prosecutor of the Specialized Anti-Corruption Prosecution and recognized the assets of People's Deputy Serhiy Lytvynenko — a member of the Servant of the People faction from the 156th district of Rivne region — as unjustified. The decision concerns three luxury vehicles totaling 7,255,976 hryvnias, which are subject to forfeiture to the state.

The Scheme: Cars in Other People's Names, Access Pass for Himself

According to the SAPO and NABU, during 2020–2021, unofficial drivers of the MP and a private company related to him purchased three 2020 vehicles: a Toyota Land Cruiser 200, a BMW 730LD, and a BMW X5 — with a total value of over 8.6 million hryvnias. Legally, the vehicles belonged to other persons, but Lytvynenko himself was the actual user — and even received an official pass to enter the territory of the Verkhovna Rada in these very cars.

Journalists from Bihus.Info established that the Toyota Land Cruiser is registered to MP's assistant Mykhaylo Shcherban, who could not recall the price of "his" car when speaking with journalists. Lytvynenko himself said he rented the car, but his declaration stated "use."

"After purchasing these assets, the official used them. Moreover, he even received a pass to enter the territory of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine."

SAPO Statement

Declaration: Only an Old Lada

In his submitted declarations, Lytvynenko listed only a Lada 21093 as his property. Of the three luxury vehicles, only one appeared in the declaration — and only as "use." The MP's annual salary in the Verkhovna Rada was 411 thousand hryvnias, his wife's salary at the Zirnenskyi alcohol plant was 100 thousand hryvnias. According to conclusions by NACC and SAPO prosecutors, the family's combined legal income was insufficient to purchase any of the three vehicles.

Civil Forfeiture — Without a Verdict

The case proceeded through the civil forfeiture mechanism: the state does not have to prove criminal origin of assets in criminal proceedings — it is sufficient to show a discrepancy between official income and actual property. SAPO filed the lawsuit in December 2024 based on NACC materials and its own collected evidence. The initial value of the vehicles was estimated at 8.6 million hryvnias, the amount collected by the court was 7.26 million: the difference could be explained by market revaluation at the time of consideration.

  • Toyota Land Cruiser 200, 2020 model — registered to the MP's assistant
  • BMW 730LD, 2020 model — registered to a related legal entity
  • BMW X5, 2020 model — registered to related individuals

Lytvynenko remains a current People's Deputy. In July 2025, he voted "in favor" of draft law No. 12414 on subordinating NABU and SAPO to the General Prosecutor — a bill that critics viewed as an attempt to weaken anti-corruption bodies.

The SAAC decision becomes effective after the deadline for appeal expires. If the defense appeals — the key question will be whether the Court of Appeal of the SAAC recognizes the discrepancy between income and property as sufficient proof even without establishing a specific source of funds.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026