Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Finances

National Commission names five signs of a Ponzi scheme — what every Ukrainian should know

The regulator has published criteria to safeguard citizens' savings. In brief: how to spot a scam and what steps to take today.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

December 29, 2025 · 2 min read

National Commission names five signs of a Ponzi scheme — what every Ukrainian should know

Why this matters

The National Securities and Stock Market Commission (NSSMC) (НКЦПФР) on December 19 approved a list of signs that indicate a financial pyramid. This is not an abstract regulatory document — it is a practical checklist that helps protect family savings amid rising risks and new fraud schemes.

Five key signs

  • Entry payment — a mandatory condition of participation: a contribution in cash, virtual assets, or the purchase of a product without real economic value.
  • Reward for mere participation — payments are promised not for actual work, but only for the contribution or for inviting new participants.
  • Source of rewards — funds for payments are formed from the entry fees of new participants, not from business profits.
  • Absence of real activity — there are no sales of goods or services that would generate income for payments.
  • Dependence of payments on recruiting new participants — payment amounts are directly tied to the contributions of those recruited later.

"The NSSMC urges citizens to be cautious, verify information about investment offers, and use only trusted sources"

— Press service of the NSSMC

Practical steps for an investor

You don't need to be a financial analyst to safeguard your savings. Here are simple actions:

  • Check whether the company is listed in the official registers of the NSSMC or other state registers.
  • Analyze the income model: is there a real product/service, or does all profit depend on new contributions?
  • Look for independent reviews and mentions in reputable sources — the press, professional forums, official statements from law enforcement agencies.
  • Do not trust guarantees of high and stable returns without a verified business plan and financial statements.
  • Consult a specialist or contact the regulator if you have doubts.

Context: example from Odesa

In February in Odesa, organizers of a scheme were exposed who cheated citizens out of around $200,000. Such a case is not isolated: the NSSMC also prepared an extended list of 10 signs of an unreliable investment project to give citizens tools for independent verification.

Conclusion

Remember: protecting savings is not just an individual matter. When Ukrainians verify information and decline dubious offers, we collectively reduce the space in which fraudsters can operate. The regulator's statements should become knowledge in every household — a simple but effective prevention of financial risks.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026