Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Finances

NBU on the risks of an 'AI bubble': direct impact limited, secondary effects — critical for Ukraine

The National Bank of Ukraine believes that the direct impact of a possible AI market crash on Ukraine’s finances would be moderate, but the hit to IT exports, remittances and international aid could prove significant. We explain why this matters now.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

February 6, 2026 · 2 min read

NBU on the risks of an 'AI bubble': direct impact limited, secondary effects — critical for Ukraine

What the National Bank Said

The NBU's inflation report states: the direct impact of a possible crash of the "AI bubble" on the foreign exchange market, the banking system and Ukraine's economy will be relatively small, but the secondary effects could become significant. This is a key distinction: the initial lines of attack will pass by our banks, while our external links and people's incomes may be hit.

"A possible crash of the artificial intelligence 'bubble' will have a relatively small direct impact on the foreign exchange market, the financial system and Ukraine's economy, but the secondary effects will be more noticeable."

— National Bank of Ukraine, inflation report

Three Main Channels of Risk

1. Reduction in exports of IT services. The Ukrainian IT sector depends on demand from global companies and startups. A sharp reduction in investment or orders for AI projects will reduce orders, put pressure on the hryvnia and decrease employment in technical professions.

2. Decline in remittances. Some Ukrainian migrants work in sectors related to technology and finance. A drop in demand in these industries would mean smaller remittances — and direct harm to domestic consumption and the exchange rate.

3. Complications for international financial assistance. In the event of a market shock, donors and investors may reallocate capital toward safer assets. That would complicate mobilizing resources for the budget and reconstruction.

Market Concentration and the International Background

The NBU points out that the share prices of the seven largest U.S. tech companies rose by 330% in 2023–2025, while the rest of the S&P 500 index rose by only 50%. Such concentration increases the risk of a correction. International organizations — the IMF, the U.S. Federal Reserve and the Bank of England — currently assess these risks as moderate, but analysts warn of possible consequences for employment and financial sectors.

Morgan Stanley forecast that by 2030 European banks could cut about 10% of staff (~212,000 people) due to automation and AI — an example of structural reorganization that amplifies channels of impact on cross-border incomes and jobs.

Pros and Cons for Ukraine

There is also a positive effect: a reduction in investment in AI infrastructure could lower global energy prices. That would reduce Russia's export revenues and potentially improve Ukraine's trade balance, since Ukraine largely imports energy supplies. In other words, part of the global market risks could coincide with our geopolitical interests.

What's Next — A Short Forecast

The risk of an "AI bubble" for Ukraine is not a direct catastrophe, but it is a test of the economy's resilience. It is important to monitor IT sector revenues, remittances and aid flows. State policy and decisive business action — market diversification, support for worker retraining and strengthening financial monitoring — can mitigate the secondary effects.

Question for partners and society: will we turn this risk into a push for diversifying export services and strengthening social protection for workers, or will we wait for the consequences? The answer is shaped not only by you — but also by our economic policy.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026