Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Finances

NBU names 13 insurers "systemically important" for the first time — they must reform governance by year-end

Obtaining status is not a reward, but an obligation: companies with the largest subsidies are now required to establish supervisory boards with independent directors and build a comprehensive internal control system by December 31, 2026.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

April 24, 2026 · 2 min read

NBU names 13 insurers "systemically important" for the first time — they must reform governance by year-end
Фото: НБУ

The National Bank of Ukraine has published for the first time a list of significant insurers as of January 1, 2026. It includes 13 companies — 11 non-life and two life insurers. This is the first such registry in the history of Ukrainian insurance supervision.

What does "significant" mean and why it's not about reputation

The criteria are simple and quantitative. A non-life insurance company enters the list if the average annual volume of premiums from the population over the last three years exceeded 1 billion hryvnias. For life insurers, the threshold is different — average technical reserves exceeding 2 billion hryvnias. The NBU enshrined these criteria in Resolution No. 194 from December 2023, with the first calculation scheduled for January 1, 2026.

An important nuance: the status becomes effective from the date of meeting the criteria — that is, from January 1, 2026 — not from the moment of the NBU registry publication. This means the countdown for compliance deadlines has already begun.

What these 13 companies are now obligated to do

Enhanced corporate governance requirements are being introduced for significant insurers. The main requirement is the mandatory establishment of a supervisory board with independent directors. Additionally, companies must establish a full-fledged risk management system, internal audit, and compliance with dedicated departments and key persons subject to NBU oversight.

"Significant insurers, identified as such as of 01.01.2026, are obligated by 31.12.2026 to bring their activities into compliance with enhanced requirements"

From NBU clarifications on the application of Resolution No. 194

For comparison: in the banking sector, such differentiation between "significant" and other market participants has existed for a long time — the NBU applies different supervision modes to them, including more frequent stress tests and stricter capital requirements. The insurance market is following this path with a delay of several years.

Context: market growth, but concentration

According to preliminary data from Forinsurer magazine, in 2025 total gross insurance premiums in Ukraine grew by 43% — to 53 billion hryvnias, despite the war. At the same time, the number of players is shrinking: companies are leaving the market due to license cancellations and non-compliance with new regulatory requirements.

Thirteen significant companies represent less than 10% of the total number of insurers on the market, yet they accumulate the lion's share of collected premiums. Concentration makes corporate governance in these companies not just an internal matter but a systemic one: a failure in any of them could damage confidence in the market as a whole.

  • Deadline: December 31, 2026 — bringing activities into compliance with enhanced requirements
  • Key requirement: supervisory board with independent directors
  • Regulator: The NBU supervises key persons — auditor, compliance manager, risk manager, actuary
  • Legal basis: NBU Resolution No. 194 of December 27, 2023

Independent directors on supervisory boards — an element that looks like protection against conflicts of interest on paper, but in practice depends on who and how verifies their actual independence. If by the end of 2026 the NBU does not publish a mechanism for verifying the independence of directors and does not apply any sanctions to those who formally complied with the requirement — will management in these companies actually change, or only in form?

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026