Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Finances

Non-bank financial institutions will issue loans to farmers under state guarantees — how this will expand access to financing

The Partial Guarantee Fund has opened a pilot for credit unions and financial companies: up to 50% guarantees, an 80 million UAH limit, and work with farmers in the community — what this means for small farms.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

March 17, 2026 · 2 min read

Non-bank financial institutions will issue loans to farmers under state guarantees — how this will expand access to financing
Підготовка до посівної у Запорізькій області, квітень 2024 року (фото - EPA)

What was adopted and why it matters

The Partial Credit Guarantee Fund for Agriculture has completed the selection of non-bank financial institutions that, as part of a pilot, will provide loans to small agricultural producers with a land bank of up to 500 ha under partial state guarantees. The Ministry of Economy reported this.

How the mechanism will work

The mechanism provides for the Fund's portfolio guarantees — up to 50% of outstanding loan debt. The total guarantee limit in the pilot is UAH 80 million. This reduces credit risk for non-bank lenders and makes loans more accessible to farms that traditionally do not have ties with banks.

"Small farmers often have limited access to credit resources. That is why it is important to involve not only banks in financing farmers, but also credit unions and financial companies that work directly in communities and know farmers' needs well"

— Taras Vysotsky, sectoral Deputy Minister

Who has already signed on

The Fund agreed to cooperate with five non-bank institutions — cooperation and guarantee agreements have been signed. Pilot participants:

  • Financial company "Aktivitis" (Kyiv)
  • Credit Union "Kredit‑Soyuz" (Cherkasy)
  • First All‑Ukrainian Credit Union, PVKS (Kamianets‑Podilskyi, Khmelnytskyi region)
  • Credit Union "Vyhoda" (Stryi, Lviv region)
  • Church Credit Union "Anisiia" (Lviv)

Context and endorsements

Previously the Fund worked only with banks; it is now testing a model of expanding the financial network through local credit unions and fintechs. A separate focus is strengthening the institutional capacity of these institutions — they will receive expert support from IPC GmbH under the technical assistance of the World Bank Group and the EU. This adds international expertise and provides social proof of the initiative's seriousness.

Practical effect for the farmer

For an agricultural producer this means: faster access to credit, a greater number of lenders in the community, and potentially lower costs to find financing. For the lender — lower risks thanks to partial guarantees and support in building capacity to work with the agricultural sector.

Next steps and risks

If the pilot proves effective, the Fund may expand the program and involve more credit unions and financial companies. At the same time, effectiveness will depend on participants' risk management, the quality of the loan portfolio, and the transparency of borrower selection.

Conclusion

This step is not a headline-grabbing reform but a pragmatic expansion of access to funds in communities. The question now is one of results: will the guarantees translate into real loans and the development of small farms, rather than just statistics on paper?

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026