Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Finances

NPL fell to 2009 levels, but half of the success is due to PrivatBank's write-off

The share of non-performing loans has reached a 15-year low of 12.9%. However, behind this figure lies a one-time operation: state banks wrote off over 170 billion hryvnias in old debts, while PrivatBank reduced its NPL portfolio by nearly 10 times in a single year.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

May 11, 2026 · 3 min read

NPL fell to 2009 levels, but half of the success is due to PrivatBank's write-off
Фото: depositphotos.com

As of April 1, 2026, the share of non-performing loans (NPL) in Ukraine's banking system fell to 12.9% — the lowest level since late 2009. The indicator declined by 1 percentage point over the quarter and by 13.7 percentage points from its peak in March 2022. The National Bank explains this by two factors: growth in new lending and settlement of old debts.

But the details paint a more complex picture.

One write-off that changed the statistics

The key turning point occurred not in the first quarter of 2026, but in December 2025: state-owned banks simultaneously wrote off over 170 billion hryvnia in old non-performing assets. That's when the NPL share broke through the 14% mark.

PrivatBank made the largest contribution. According to the Financial Club, its NPL portfolio contracted by nearly 10 times — from 170.3 billion hryvnia at the beginning of 2025 to 18.8 billion hryvnia at the start of 2026. For comparison: all banks from foreign banking groups combined wrote off only 7.26 billion hryvnia over the year, while privately-owned banks wrote off 5.95 billion hryvnia.

"New loans continue to maintain high quality, with default levels at historically low levels"

National Bank of Ukraine

This is true regarding new loans. But the reduction in overall NPL is partly the result of accounting balance sheet cleanup, not just borrowers returning to payment discipline.

What's happening with actual lending

There is also an organic component. The gross volume of loans in the banking system in the first quarter of 2026 increased by 75.8 billion hryvnia (5.6%) — to 1.436 trillion hryvnia. Net hryvnia-denominated business loans in March rose 32% year-over-year, while consumer loans rose 36%. The volume of actual non-performing loans itself declined by 3.8 billion hryvnia, to 185.5 billion hryvnia.

The NPL share for individuals fell to 10.3%, while for businesses it remains higher: after declining by 1.3 percentage points over the quarter, it stands at approximately 16.6% (according to NBU data as of early March). The corporate segment is recovering more slowly — and it is this segment that forms the bulk of remaining risk.

State banks: cleaner balance sheets, but the same system share

The paradox is that state-owned banks, which most actively wrote off debts and improved statistics, remain dominant in the system. Their share exceeds 60% of assets — a level that the NBU publicly considers excessive and aims to reduce to 25-30%.

Zelenskyy has already demanded the urgent sale of Sense Bank and Ukrgasbank — this is part of obligations to the IMF. However, PrivatBank, whose one-time write-off had the greatest impact on NPL statistics, is not planned to be sold yet: it remains a profitable source of budget revenue.

  • Write-offs remove NPL from the balance sheet, but do not return funds — creditors effectively recognize losses
  • New loans are of good quality, but are issued under conditions of active state support and military benefits
  • Corporate NPL (≈16.6%) remains twice as high as retail (10.3%)
  • Privatization of two state banks will compete for a narrow circle of investors willing to accept war risk

The 12.9% figure represents real improvement from the 39.1% peak in 2022. But if in 2027 state banks do not carry out another large-scale write-off, and lending growth slows due to combat operations or rate increases — will NPL remain below 13% on its own, without one-time balance sheet operations?

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026