Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Finances

Parliamentary swap: scrapping lifetime PEP status in exchange for votes on the tax package — IMF tranche hinges on it

The Verkhovna Rada faces a choice: approve unpopular taxes now to avoid losing funding in spring 2026. We examine what’s being proposed and what the consequences will be for the state and ordinary citizens.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

January 27, 2026 · 2 min read

Parliamentary swap: scrapping lifetime PEP status in exchange for votes on the tax package — IMF tranche hinges on it

Essence of the proposal

According to Ekonomichna Pravda, the government plans to bundle a number of unpopular tax initiatives into a single bill and offer deputies a compromise — to abolish the lifelong PEP status (politically exposed person) in exchange for their support of the changes. This is part of the agreements needed to launch a new cooperation program with the IMF worth $8.2 billion, on which, sources say, the EU assistance package of €90 billion also depends.

Why it matters

If the reform package is not adopted within the set deadlines, funding could become an issue: current estimates suggest Ukraine’s money could run out as early as April 2026. So this is not a political dispute for ratings, but a real choice between temporary political risk and the stability of public finances.

What exactly is proposed to be included in the package

Among the key initiatives that must be agreed to receive the tranche:

  • Abolition of the exemption for duty-free import of parcels worth up to €150;
  • Tax on digital platforms (the so-called “OLX tax”);
  • Fixing the military levy at 5% on a permanent basis;
  • Possible introduction of VAT for individual entrepreneurs (FOPs) — discussed separately and with mitigations;
  • Mitigations: raising the threshold for mandatory VAT registration from UAH 1 million to UAH 2 million, postponing changes until the end of the war, and banning tax authorities from blocking VAT invoices for small businesses.

"For deputies this is really a painful issue, because this status effectively closes off working with most banks for them. For example, PrivatBank simply blocks PEP accounts without distinction. Because of this, no one wants to go into public service."

— a member of parliament, a source for “Ekonomichna Pravda”

Who will be hit and how

Postal parcels: abolishing the duty-free limit will raise costs for citizens who regularly receive goods from abroad. Digital platforms: the tax could increase commissions or sellers' costs on online marketplaces. FOPs: VAT for some individual entrepreneurs would mean additional administration and expenses, although the list of mitigations is intended to ease pressure on small businesses.

Authoritative perspective

The IMF and the EU emphasize structural changes that will improve the tax base and revenue administration. IMF Managing Director Kristalina Georgieva has repeatedly stressed that reforming the tax system and broadening the base is not only a creditors' demand but also a tool for long-term economic resilience.

What it means for politics and security

Politically, the proposal is a "package" approach: less popular steps are presented together with concessions to deputies to secure votes. For state security, the issue is indisputable: stable funding for the military and social payments depends on continued international support.

Conclusion

We see a typical dilemma: short-term political costs versus long-term financial stability. The ball is now in parliament’s court — are MPs ready to put the state's interest above the protection of certain privileges? This decision will determine whether the country receives funds to support the front and the economy already next spring.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026