Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Finances

Powell Ready to Stay at the Fed — How It Could Complicate Trump’s Plans and Affect Interest Rates

Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell hinted he would remain on the Fed’s Board through 2028, until an investigation is concluded. That lowers Donald Trump’s chances of securing a majority on the Federal Reserve and changes expectations for future interest-rate decisions.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

March 19, 2026 · 2 min read

Powell Ready to Stay at the Fed — How It Could Complicate Trump’s Plans and Affect Interest Rates
Джером Пауелл (Фото: EPA / JIM LO SCALZO)

What happened

The Chair of the Federal Reserve Jerome Powell said at a press conference that he does not plan to leave the Fed until the Justice Department's investigation into him is "fully complete, transparent and final," the Wall Street Journal reports. Powell's official term as chair ends on May 15, but as a Board member he can remain until 2028 — he was separately confirmed to a 14-year term.

Why this matters

The Fed's Board has seven seats; three are currently held by people appointed by Donald Trump. If Powell stays, the Trump administration will find it harder to form a majority on the Board in favor of more aggressive monetary easing. This is a direct mechanism of influence on future rate decisions, which the administration seeks to lower.

"Further rate cuts are possible in two cases: a slowdown in the economy or clear progress in fighting inflation. If we do not see such progress, rate cuts will not occur."

— Jerome Powell, Chair of the Federal Reserve

How it affects markets and us

Decisions about Fed leadership have direct consequences for global financial markets: from borrowing costs to exchange rates and the cost of war-related loans. For Ukraine, this means that stable and predictable decisions by the U.S. regulator make it easier to plan external financing and support from partners.

Analysts note that keeping Powell on the Board would increase the likelihood of gradual, rather than sharp, easing of Fed policy — a scenario that reduces the risk of renewed inflation spikes and abrupt market swings.

Context: the scandal and the renovation

Powell has previously spoken of political pressure and called the Justice Department's subpoenas in the case of the Fed buildings' renovation politically motivated; the Wall Street Journal highlights these statements. The Fed's website indicates that restoration work is underway on the Eccles Building and the building at 1951 Constitution Avenue, which have not undergone comprehensive renovation since the 1930s. The project is planned through 2027, and its cost has been criticized by Donald Trump, a man with experience in real estate.

What’s next

If Powell stays, the market will receive a signal of policy continuity and greater predictability of decisions — at least until further changes in the Board's composition. For Trump, a full reorientation of the Fed in the short term looks difficult: it would require Senate confirmations of nominees or the departure of other Board members.

The question for Washington and for the market is simple: can political pressure change the balance on the Fed faster than economic risks will require? The answer will determine not only the future of U.S. monetary policy but also the conditions for international assistance and financing, which are important for our country as well.

Source: Wall Street Journal; official website of the Federal Reserve.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026