Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Finances

After Change of Power in Budapest: Hungary Returns $75 Million and National Savings Bank Gold to Ukraine Seized Under Orban

What Hungary's Orbán regime had held under arrest for nearly three months on money laundering charges, the new Hungarian authorities returned without trial — a signal of resetting relations, but not without questions about the mechanism and accountability.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

May 6, 2026 · 3 min read

After Change of Power in Budapest: Hungary Returns $75 Million and National Savings Bank Gold to Ukraine Seized Under Orban
Фото: Ощадбанк / Facebook

On March 5, 2026, Hungary's counterterrorism center (TEK) stopped two armored vehicles of Oschadbank on the M5 motorway. The convoy was transporting $40 million, €35 million, and 9 kg of gold — as part of a standard route between the Austrian branch of Raiffeisen Bank and Ukraine. Seven security guards were detained. Budapest called it a "security measure" and opened a money laundering case.

A few weeks later, when the opposition party "Tisza" led by Peter Magyar won a constitutional majority in parliamentary elections on April 12, the diplomatic context changed radically. President Zelensky stated that negotiations on the return of assets would be conducted with the new leadership. Now the money and valuables are in Ukraine.

What and how was returned

According to Zelensky, Hungary returned all Oschadbank funds and valuables — the amount corresponds to what was seized: $40 million, €35 million, and 9 kg of gold. The security guards were released earlier. The bank's armored vehicles were handed over to the Ukrainian side on March 12 — with damaged equipment, and some gold bars had disappeared by that time. Now, according to the president, "the money and valuables are already on the territory of Ukraine."

"An important step in relations with Hungary: today the funds and valuables of Oschadbank, which were seized by Hungarian special services in March this year, were returned."

President Volodymyr Zelensky

Why now and who benefits

The timeline is telling. The new Hungarian authorities effectively closed the case before Magyar's official appointment as prime minister — and before any court proceedings. Throughout April, Magyar publicly cautioned against haste, saying that society saw "only propaganda content" and that there were "more important matters" than Oschadbank. However, the return happened quickly.

For Magyar, this is a way to distance himself from Orbán's legacy and immediately establish a pro-European course — without formally acknowledging his predecessor's guilt. For Kyiv, it's a precedent: if the new Hungary returns assets without lengthy court battles, it signals a qualitatively different dynamic in relations after 15 years of Orbánism.

The context is broader. According to the National Bank of Ukraine, Ukrainian banks imported over $1.7 billion in cash currency in January-February 2026 alone. The security of cash transport routes through the EU is not a banking detail, but a matter of liquidity for the war economy. This is why the Foreign Ministry immediately prepared lawsuits, and Oschadbank suspended currency imports from the EU after the incident.

  • March 5 — TEK stops the convoy on M5, security guards are arrested
  • March 6 — seven security guards return to Ukraine, funds remain
  • March 12 — armored vehicles returned, but without money and gold
  • April 12 — Magyar's "Tisza" wins constitutional majority, Orbán admits defeat
  • May 2026 — funds and valuables returned to Ukraine

What remained unanswered

No official statement on closing the criminal case that Orbán's authorities opened. No accountability for damage to the armored vehicles and missing gold bars. Financial analyst Andriy Shevchishin characterized the detention in March as political revenge rather than a legal procedure — and the return without a court verdict essentially confirms this.

If Magyar is truly building a "new Hungary" in relations with Ukraine, the next test will not be rhetoric, but specifics: whether the illegality of the March seizure will be officially recognized — and whether Oschadbank will receive compensation for damaged property and months of frozen assets.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026