Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Finances

Verkhovna Rada ratified an agreement with Poland's BGK: acceleration of reconstruction and a new investment channel

Parliament has granted permission for Bank Gospodarstwa Krajowego to operate in Ukraine — we explain what will change for reconstruction projects, what safeguards to expect, and why this matters now.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

February 26, 2026 · 2 min read

Verkhovna Rada ratified an agreement with Poland's BGK: acceleration of reconstruction and a new investment channel
Фото: Adrian Grycuk, CC BY 3.0 PL, via Wikimedia Commons

Briefly — why this matters to you

On 26 February the Verkhovna Rada ratified an agreement between the governments of Ukraine and Poland on the activities of the Polish Bank Gospodarstwa Krajowego (BGK) in Ukraine. 261 deputies voted in favor. This creates the legal foundations for BGK to operate as a donor and financial instrument focused on reconstruction and investment.

What the agreement provides

Activities and instruments. BGK will be able to provide the government, state and private institutions with financial and technical assistance in the form of loans, grants, guarantees and export support for recovery and development projects identified in cooperation between Poland, Ukraine and BGK.

Legal regime. The same regulatory requirements that apply to ordinary banks in Ukraine will not apply to BGK and its representations; instead the bank will have obligations for transparent reporting — an annual report on implemented projects, volumes of financing and the directions of funds' use.

"It will be able to provide the government of Ukraine, state and private institutions and organizations with financial and technical assistance in the form of loans or other financial instruments, such as export support, grants or guarantees for the implementation of projects on Ukraine's recovery and development"

— Text of the agreement (signed 25 September 2025, Warsaw)

Context and consequences

Acceleration of reconstruction. BGK already opened a representative office in Kyiv in February 2025 to coordinate projects funded from EU funds. Formalizing its status allows for speeding up the signing of loan and guarantee mechanisms, which has a direct impact on timelines for rebuilding infrastructure and launching new investment projects.

Mobilizing additional resources. The presence of a Polish state mechanism strengthens the investment platform between the two governments and allows Polish, Ukrainian and European funds to be combined for specific projects.

Questions of transparency and sovereignty. It is important that BGK will report on its activities — this is a safeguard. At the same time, in February 2026 Polish media reported that Poland is considering acquiring stakes in large Ukrainian state banks (Oschadbank, Ukreximbank), and BGK was mentioned among potential instruments alongside PKO and the Polish Development Fund. This signals that parliamentary decisions create both opportunities and reasons for close oversight.

Proof on the ground. Polish financial presence in Ukraine already exists: PKO Bank Polski operates through Kredobank, and BGK coordinates work with EU funds — this is not an isolated project but part of broader economic integration.

Conclusion

Ratifying the agreement with BGK is a pragmatic step to accelerate reconstruction and attract resources. However, effectiveness will depend on the specific contract terms, transparent monitoring and maintaining control over key financial institutions. Whether declarations will turn into real investments now depends on our negotiating teams and on how strict the reporting and audit mechanisms will be.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026