Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Finances

Rada rejected the law on revenue from digital platforms — part of the IMF program's conditions now in doubt

Money loves silence, but these figures are worth knowing: a failed vote could jeopardize the implementation of international standards and financial support.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

March 10, 2026 · 2 min read

Rada rejected the law on revenue from digital platforms — part of the IMF program's conditions now in doubt
Фото: пресслужба Верховної Ради

The Verkhovna Rada's decision and its significance

On March 10 the Verkhovna Rada did not support draft law No. 14025 on taxation of income received through digital platforms. 168 deputies voted in favor — not enough for adoption, so the bill was fully rejected. This decision affects one of the key elements of the new International Monetary Fund program for Ukraine.

Briefly about the bill

The document envisaged implementation of the OECD rules on reporting by operators of digital platforms and the provisions of Council Directive (EU) 2021/514. Operators (Airbnb, Uber, Bolt, Uklon, OLX, etc.) would have to identify seller-users and submit reports to the State Tax Service — effectively becoming tax agents so that users would largely not have to declare income themselves.

The system provided for two personal income tax rates: a preferential 5% and a general 18%. The preference would apply under a number of conditions: opening a separate bank account for platform income, having no hired employees, not trading in excise goods, and annual income up to UAH 6.7 million (834 minimum wages). Provisions were also foreseen for small sales and a tax-free minimum of UAH 38,500 per year.

"This draft law is not about introducing some taxes. This draft law is about granting relief to sales transactions. Today [de jure] every sold sock is taxed. We propose to introduce a relief of EUR 2,000 per person for such sales without any taxes, and if it exceeds that amount, it will pay 5% instead of 23%, as it is now"

— Danylo Hetmantsev, head of the Tax Committee

Support and objections

Some platforms, including Uklon, Bolt, Uber and Glovo, expressed support for the bill, while OLX criticized several provisions. Parliament did not obtain the required majority of votes, so implementation of international reporting rules has been postponed.

Consequences: what this means for the economy and partners' trust

The failure of the bill directly affects the fulfilment of one of the "milestones" in the IMF program for Ukraine. This is not only a technical taxation issue: it concerns the trust of international partners and the country's readiness to implement OECD standards and European legislation.

For platform users the consequences have two sides. On one hand, platforms acting as tax agents could simplify reporting; on the other, the introduction of new rules creates additional requirements for small online businesses and those who earn extra income from internet sales.

Now the government and parliament face a practical task: either to rework the initiative to find a political compromise that will secure sufficient votes, or to seek other mechanisms to implement the standards without losing the support of international partners. Whether this will change lawmakers' approach will be decided in upcoming sessions, but time and international trust are limited resources.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026