Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Finances

Russia in a decade of stagnation — what it means for Ukraine's security and economy

The Kremlin for the first time acknowledges systemic stagnation: declining GDP, deficits, and losses in oil and gas revenues. We analyze why this matters for Ukraine and what opportunities it offers our partners.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

January 9, 2026 · 2 min read

Russia in a decade of stagnation — what it means for Ukraine's security and economy

According to intelligence

The Foreign Intelligence Service records that Russia's economy has entered a state of stagnation. After 4.5% GDP growth in the fourth quarter of 2024, growth slowed to 1.4% in the first quarter of 2025, then to 1.1% in the second quarter and only 0.6% in the third quarter. Official rhetoric wraps this in terms of "planned cooling," but the figures point to a different picture: budget deficits are felt both at the federal level and in the regions.

"Such a trajectory means not temporary difficulties, but a deep and prolonged degradation of the economy. Russia is entering a decade where recovery looks unlikely and financial losses are inevitable."

— The Foreign Intelligence Service

Key drivers of the problems

One of the central factors is the drop in oil and gas revenues: by estimates, they will fall by approximately 43% from 2019 levels. That means not only less money in the budget, but also constrained ability to finance large state programs, infrastructure and — critically — defense at its current scale.

What this means for Ukraine

First, prolonged economic stagnation weakens the aggressor's resource base: declining revenues make long-term financing of large-scale military projects and procurements more difficult. Second, deficits and economic pressure raise the risks of internal instability and intensified repression — this alters scenarios but does not make war impossible. Third, for Ukraine this is an opportunity: international sanctions and diplomatic pressure have more time to strike the Kremlin's financial levers more effectively, while partners can step up support as Russia's resources shrink.

Practical consequences and recommendations

Analysts point to three practical consequences: 1) a reduced ability of the Kremlin to quickly replenish losses; 2) increased competition for limited resources within the elites; 3) possible overstrain of regional budgets, which reduces the logistical base for sustained operations. For Ukraine and its partners the logic is simple: maintain sanctions and financial pressure, strengthen Europe's energy diversification and scale up military-technical assistance that turns the opponent's economic weakness into a strategic advantage.

Conclusion

The numbers indicate not a temporary downturn but a structural problem: Russia is entering a period when recovery will be long and costly. For Ukraine this is not a guarantee of a quick victory, but an opportunity for consistent political and economic work with partners. It is now important that declarations of solidarity be turned into long-term plans and funding that strengthen our security and economic resilience.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026