Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Finances

Russia spent its annual deficit reserve in three months: what this means for the war

Russia's budget deficit exceeded $58 billion in the first quarter of 2026 — an amount the Kremlin had planned to spend throughout the entire year. This is more than just a number on a spreadsheet.

Oleg Bazylewicz

By Oleg Bazylewicz

April 9, 2026 · 3 min read

Russia spent its annual deficit reserve in three months: what this means for the war
Фото: Сергій Ільніцький / EPA

February 2026. Somewhere in Chelyabinsk, a machine-building plant transitions to a three-hour working day — state orders are being reduced. In Moscow, Finance Ministry officials hold closed meetings. And in public reports, a figure appears that is hard to explain without consequences: Russia's federal budget deficit for January-March 2026 exceeded $58 billion.

This is more than the Kremlin had set as a limit for the entire year.

What Happened to the Money

The Russian budget relied on two pillars: oil and gas revenues and domestic borrowing. Both are now under pressure. Urals prices have been trading well below the break-even level that Russia's Finance Ministry built into the budget — around $70 per barrel. Meanwhile, military spending is not being reduced: according to estimates by CREA and Kyiv School of Economics analysts, Russia's military expenditures in 2025-2026 account for over a third of the federal budget.

When revenues fall while spending is locked in by weapons contracts and "combat" payments, the deficit is not planned — it emerges as a fact.

Three Months Instead of Twelve

Exceeding the annual planned target already in the first quarter is not a technical planning error. It is a signal of structural imbalance. Russia either deliberately underestimated forecasts in official documents, or does not control spending dynamics, or — most likely — both.

For comparison: Ukraine in 2022-2023 also had a colossal deficit, but it was covered by international grants and loans with transparent reporting to donors. Russia closes the hole mainly through domestic bond borrowing — OFZ — which are purchased by state banks essentially with central bank emission money. This is not external debt, but it is not free either: inflation in Russia already exceeds 9%, the Central Bank of Russia's key rate is held at 21%.

From Figures to People

An abstract deficit becomes concrete when regions begin to delay social payments and defense companies reduce civilian contractors. This is what fiscal stress looks like at the level of an individual city: not a declared collapse, but a gradual tightening of possibilities.

Economist Aleksandra Prokopenko, former director of the Central Bank of Russia's department who emigrated after 2022, has repeatedly noted in her materials for the Carnegie Endowment: the Russian economy does not collapse instantly, it degrades in layers — first the periphery, then the middle class, then institutions.

What Is Not Visible in the Numbers

$58 billion in deficit is the official figure from Rosstat and Russia's Finance Ministry. The real figure may be larger: part of military spending goes through extrabudgetary funds and state corporations that are not consolidated in federal reporting. Independent verification is impossible — Russia has significantly restricted the publication of budget details since 2022.

In other words, $58 billion is what the Kremlin decided to show. The lower bound, not the upper.

What Comes Next

Russia has several tools to plug the hole: the National Welfare Fund (NWF), whose reserves have been significantly reduced since 2022, new borrowing, and, as a last resort, direct monetization of debt. Each of these paths has a price — inflationary or political.

The critical question is not whether the Russian economy will collapse — it will not collapse instantly. The question is at what level of fiscal exhaustion the Kremlin will be forced to choose between payments for "combat" contracts to contractors and funding for new offensive operations — and whether this choice will occur before or after the next major strike on Ukrainian infrastructure.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026