Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Finances

List — 40 Days Before Appointment: NBU Opened Proceedings Against Sense Bank Management, Allegedly Selected by Veselyi

The regulator is checking the qualifications of CEO Stupak and the independence of Supervisory Board Chair Gladyshenko — individuals whose names surfaced in the "Minditch recordings" before the official Cabinet competition.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

May 6, 2026 · 2 min read

List — 40 Days Before Appointment: NBU Opened Proceedings Against Sense Bank Management, Allegedly Selected by Veselyi
Фото: Сенс Банк

On May 9, 2025, Vasyl Veselyi, connected to the Presidential Office, listed six desired members of Sense Bank's supervisory board in a phone call with Oleksandr Tsukerman. Forty days later, the Cabinet of Ministers appointed these exact people. Among them is Mykola Hladyshenko, who became board chair in October 2025. Now the NBU is investigating both him and bank CEO Oleksii Stupak.

What exactly the NBU is investigating

The regulator opened two separate proceedings of different types. Regarding Stupak — an administrative proceeding to assess compliance with qualification requirements. Regarding Hladyshenko — monitoring of compliance with independence criteria required of bank supervisory board members. The difference is fundamental: the first may result in the CEO's removal, the second raises the question of whether the board chair can be considered an independent director at all if his name appeared in conversations between subjects of a criminal investigation.

The NBU made its decision the day after a meeting of the Verkhovna Rada's Temporary Investigative Commission on Economic Security — and directly stated it had considered "detected information about signs of a hidden parallel management structure" during the time of former sanctioned owners.

The recordings that started the process

Ukrainska Pravda published transcripts of conversations where Veselyi and Tsukerman discussed not only the board's composition but also the distribution of "quotas."

"There should be 5 or 6 of our people in this whole crowd of nine"

Vasyl Veselyi — in conversation with Tsukerman, according to Ukrainska Pravda

The conversations also mention the pseudonyms "Surgeon" (identified by NABU as Andrii Yermak) and "Sigismund" (identified by NABU as former Energy Minister Herman Halushchenko). Hladyshenko himself denied knowing Mindich and any connection to the schemes.

A bank with problems even before the scandal

Sense Bank came to the state following nationalization with significant baggage: the NBU recorded double bookkeeping, active lending to related parties dating back to 2012, and submitted materials to law enforcement in March 2025. Over the past four years, the regulator conducted five inspections of the bank and fined it twice — in 2023 for 47.7 million hryvnias, in 2025 for 4.1 million hryvnias.

A separate topic at the TSK meeting was the bank's monopoly on the gambling market: according to MP Yaroslav Zheleznyak, 80-90% of online casino transactions in Ukraine pass through Sense Bank. The NBU confirmed that one of three financial monitoring inspections was entirely related to the gambling business.

A procedure without guaranteed results

Deputy Finance Minister Yuri Draganchuk insisted at the TSK meeting that the supervisory board selection was conducted in accordance with legislation and went through several stages. NBU First Deputy Governor Dmytro Oliynyk acknowledged a lack of risk management competencies in the current board composition — but this is a separate complaint unrelated to the recordings.

The NBU's administrative proceeding is not an automatic dismissal: the regulator must prove non-compliance with qualification requirements or independence criteria under current legislation. In other words, even the match between Veselyi's list and the actual board composition is not in itself a legal basis — specific norms that the managers violated are needed.

If the NBU confirms non-compliance and Hladyshenko loses independent director status, the question will arise of the legitimacy of decisions the supervisory board has already made in its current composition.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026