Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Finances

Trillion Without Payment Guarantees: How Ukraine Is Building a Mechanism to Recover Damages from Russia

Damage from 12 years of war is estimated at over $1 trillion, but between this figure and actual funds stands at least a year of ratifications, legal labyrinths, and $300 billion in frozen assets that remain inaccessible in full.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

May 14, 2026 · 3 min read

Trillion Without Payment Guarantees: How Ukraine Is Building a Mechanism to Recover Damages from Russia
Фото: EPA / SERGEY DOLZHENKO

Deputy Head of the Presidential Office Iryna Mudra cited a figure that has already become a refrain of official Kyiv: damages from Russian aggression since 2014 exceed $1 trillion. But more important than the sum itself is the answer to the question — who, when, and through what mechanism will pay it.

What Already Exists: Registry, Convention, Ratification

The international compensation mechanism is being built in stages. The Registry of Damages in The Hague began operating in April 2024 — it has already received over 150,000 claims from victims, with the total expected number ranging from 6 to 10 million.

The next step is the International Compensation Commission. The convention on its establishment was signed on December 16, 2025 in The Hague by 35 countries and the European Union. The Verkhovna Rada ratified the document on April 30, 2026.

"Realistically, we need about another year for ratifications, and by mid or the third quarter of 2027 there will definitely be 25 ratifications"

Iryna Mudra, Deputy Head of the Presidential Office, European Integration

Exactly 25 ratifications — the legal threshold for the convention to enter into force. After that, the commission will have three months to launch. That means a realistic horizon — late 2027 or early 2028.

Where the Money Is: $300 Billion in Question

The $1 trillion damages estimate is the sum of claims. Actual coverage is much lower. The World Bank estimates verified damages from the full-scale invasion at $667 billion. The main source Kyiv is counting on is the frozen assets of Russia's Central Bank at around $300 billion, predominantly in the European Union.

But there is a direct legal constraint: these funds are currently not confiscated, only frozen. Profits from them partially go to Ukraine through the ERA mechanism, but there is no access to the main body of assets. As Mudra herself acknowledged:

"At the moment, there is no political will to gain access to the entire sum of Russian assets"

Iryna Mudra, UNIAN

At the same time, she noted that Ukraine "has great hopes to press the issue of frozen assets" and transfer them to the compensation fund as a "quick, legal source" for payments.

Practical Dimension: What It Means for Victims

For citizens, the algorithm is as follows: submit a claim to the Registry of Damages (currently 13 categories are open, more will open soon), wait for the commission to assess the claim, and receive a decision on the amount. But a decision is not yet money: payment depends on the compensation fund being filled, which does not yet exist.

Mudra emphasized that Ukraine "will not allow" the commission's decisions to remain on paper. However, there is no enforcement mechanism: Russia can ignore any international decisions just as it has ignored ECHR decisions for over 10 years.

Why This Is More Than Just Numbers

$1 trillion is not just destroyed houses. According to Mudra, the sum includes environmental damage, lost business, energy infrastructure degradation, and human capital — that is, categories that are difficult to assess and even harder to prove in international court. The calculation methodology is still not standardized, which opens an opportunity for Russia to challenge every figure.

If by the end of 2027 25 countries ratify the convention and the commission actually begins work — the next key test: will Ukraine and its partners succeed in transforming the frozen $300 billion from a "potential source" into a real compensation fund without waiting for a formal peace with Russia.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026