Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Finances

EU criticizes Belgium over lack of transparency on taxation of Russian assets

Western diplomats accuse Belgium of reluctance to disclose how tax revenues from frozen Russian reserves are being used, making it harder to verify whether its commitments to Ukraine are being met.

Oleg Bazylewicz

By Oleg Bazylewicz

November 28, 2025 · 1 min read

EU criticizes Belgium over lack of transparency on taxation of Russian assets

Western diplomats say the EU has complaints against Belgium over a lack of transparency in handling taxes generated from frozen Russian assets.

Diplomats' complaints

Five representatives from different European countries say Belgium may have a hidden motive to retain these funds, as they generate significant tax revenues.

In their assessment, Brussels is breaching last year's international commitment to disclose data on the use of taxes from frozen reserves. Taxes continue to be credited to Belgium's state budget, making it impossible to verify whether all obligations to Kyiv have been met.

Diplomats also expressed doubts about whether the windfall tax revenues will actually be transferred to Ukraine, and stressed the security risks for Europe if decisions are delayed.

Financial assessments and positions

Experts say that tax revenues are difficult to track. The Kiel Institute estimates Belgium's total obligations to Ukraine at €3.44 billion for the period from the start of the war to 31 August 2025, while tax revenues from Russian assets in 2024 amounted to about €1.7 billion.

The Belgian government said that taxes from frozen Russian reserves were directed to support Ukraine, while not specifying whether all the funds have already been transferred.

In 2024, a number of Western countries accused Belgium of using part of these tax revenues to cover ordinary state budget expenditures. The previous government promised to transfer these receipts to an EU and G7 financial mechanism for Ukraine, but this has not been done.

Belgian Prime Minister Bart De Wever told the leadership of the European Commission that adopting a reparations loan mechanism based on frozen Russian assets could complicate the signing of a peace agreement between Ukraine and Russia.

  • On 10 September the European Commission proposed the idea of a reparations loan of up to €140 billion, calculated on the basis of the remaining frozen Russian assets.
  • Under such a loan, Ukraine could receive roughly €45 billion annually in 2026–2028.
  • On 23 October the decision on the reparations loan was postponed until December.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026