Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Finances

Ukrderzhfond Becomes Paying Agency — First Step Toward EU Financing for Farmers

The government has designated the fund as the paying agency — an institutional change that makes access for Ukrainian farmers to European support programs more realistic. We explain what this means for funding, transparency and preparation for EU standards.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

December 31, 2025 · 2 min read

Ukrderzhfond Becomes Paying Agency — First Step Toward EU Financing for Farmers

What happened

On December 31 the Cabinet of Ministers designated the Ukrainian State Fund for Support of Farming Households as the Paying Agency in the field of state support for agriculture. The Ministry of Economy reported this — a step that lays the institutional groundwork for bringing the national system of support for the agricultural sector closer to EU standards.

Why it matters

The status of a Paying Agency is not merely a formality. It enables the use of instruments of the EU’s Common Agricultural Policy and makes the mechanism for attracting European financing more realistic. In other words: it is a path from declarations to the conditions under which international donors and programs can directly cooperate with the Ukrainian payment system.

How the mechanism will work

Under the law “On the Principles of State Agrarian Policy and the State Policy of Rural Development,” the main task of the agency is to administer state support in accordance with European requirements. This also involves implementing an Integrated Administration and Control System (IACS), the adoption of which the Verkhovna Rada supported on October 8 (bill No. 13202-1).

What this gives farmers and the budget

Transparency and accountability are the key words. The new structure should establish clear rules for the allocation of funds, equal access to assistance, and control mechanisms that reduce the risk of abuse. For the state budget, this is a chance to gain greater trust from partners and, as a result, attract external financing for specific rural support programs.

Risks and questions

The real effect will depend on the agency’s operational capacity: digital infrastructure, staff, independent audits, and clear control procedures. Without these elements, status alone will not turn into money in farmers’ pockets. The effectiveness of the IACS and readiness for audits according to European standards are key success criteria.

"Designating a Paying Agency is a key step toward implementing the European model of agricultural support in Ukraine. We are creating a clear and controlled financing mechanism that will provide agricultural producers with equal access to state and international assistance while meeting EU standards"

— Denys Bashlyk, Deputy Minister of Economy, Environment and Agriculture

What’s next

Now the question is about operational implementation: when the agency will receive the resources to launch the IACS, which audit and transparency standards will be introduced, and how quickly international programs will be able to begin financing through the new mechanism. experts and international partners are watching this process closely — because how fast the Ukrainian agricultural sector gains access to European support instruments depends on it.

A question for readers and decision-makers: will there be sufficient political will and technical resources to make this transition not only legal but real and beneficial for Ukrainian farmers?

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026