Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Finances

Ukrposhta seeks an extra 2 billion in capital — how the postal bank plan is reshaping the balance of power

Ihor Smilyansky says an independent valuation will turn Ukrposhta’s balance into a surplus. We break down what this means for the state budget, banks and pensioners right now.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

February 16, 2026 · 2 min read

Ukrposhta seeks an extra 2 billion in capital — how the postal bank plan is reshaping the balance of power
Фото: Укрпошта / Telegram

What it's about

The national operator JSC Ukrposhta is preparing to confirm its capital at a level of over UAH 2 billion after the National Bank last year valued it at negative UAH 661.5 million. This was stated in an interview with RBC-Ukraine by Ukrposhta's CEO Ihor Smiliansky.

What the head of Ukrposhta said

"We engaged an independent appraiser who carried out a new valuation of assets that will be added to capital. I think the auditors will confirm it; our capital will be somewhere around plus UAH 2 billion"

— Ihor Smiliansky, CEO of JSC «Ukrposhta»

Smiliansky claims that the National Bank is creating obstacles to the creation of a Postal Bank. He provides financial calculations: under the agency-agreement model Ukrposhta would reportedly have minus UAH 1 billion, the state would receive plus UAH 800 million, banks — plus UAH 100 million, and the consolidated effect would be about minus UAH 100 million. Under the own-bank model, in his estimate, the state would gain plus UAH 1.7 billion, banks would lose minus UAH 900 million, and Ukrposhta would receive plus UAH 200 million, for a total of roughly plus UAH 600 million.

Context: IMF, legislation and PINbank

This is not an isolated initiative. In July 2024 the IMF agreed to the possibility of creating postal banks, after which a draft law on limited banking activity for new market entrants emerged. In January 2025 the Cabinet transferred PINbank from the State Property Fund to the Ministry of Communities and Territories — on its basis Ukrposhta planned to build a Postal Bank. However, on 16 September 2025 the National Bank proposed to close PINbank instead of transferring it — an important signal from the regulator about the project's future.

What this means for people and the market

Ukrposhta already accepts about 18% of all utility payments and pays pensions. According to Smiliansky, the operator effectively extends credit to pensioners in villages "on a notebook" — in other words, it performs financial functions without formal banking status. Confirmation of capital could formalize these services and expand access to financial services in the regions. At the same time, however, it raises questions about the concentration of the state in the banking system and the fulfillment of obligations to international partners.

What next

The next steps are completion of the independent audit and a decision by the regulator and the government regarding PINbank. If the audit confirms plus UAH 2 billion, Ukrposhta will gain a weighty argument in the discussion about a postal bank. However, the adoption of such a decision lies in the realm of political compromises, market trust and regulatory priorities.

Economists emphasize: a new player could improve access to payments and services in communities, but the real benefit will depend on liquidity, risk management and the ability to demonstrate the model's effectiveness. The ball is in the regulator's and the government's court: will these calculations be turned into a mechanism that actually works for the benefit of Ukrainians?

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026