Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Finances

Ukrposhta made a U-turn: why the state operator now wants VAT on parcels from Temu and AliExpress

# Ukrposhta Changes Stance on Small Import Parcel Taxation A year ago, Ukrposhta blocked a bill on taxing small import parcels. Now it supports it. What changed, and why this is suddenly beneficial for everyone except the buyer.

Oleg Bazylewicz

By Oleg Bazylewicz

May 22, 2026 · 2 min read

Ukrposhta made a U-turn: why the state operator now wants VAT on parcels from Temu and AliExpress
Фото: Укрпошта
```html

In 2025, Ukraine received 74.5 million parcels with customs value up to 150 euros — and from more than half of them the state received no VAT at all. According to calculations by the Institute for Socio-Economic Transformation, the budget lost at least 18.6 billion hryvnias in just this year. Armed with these figures, supporters of the draft law came to the round table — and they were not alone.

What happened to Ukrposhta's position

Yulia Pavlenko, director of the International Operations Department of Ukrposhta, confirmed the company's change in position directly: "We support this [revised] draft law". Just a few months ago, the general director of Ukrposhta was categorically opposed — the main argument was the chaos that could arise at customs due to the lack of digital integration.

Now, according to Pavlenko, this argument has been removed: 100% of imported mail is already processed in paperless mode, and the draft law itself contains safeguards that will prevent import stoppages even from small foreign senders. The technical obstacle has disappeared — and the position has changed.

What really stands behind the figures

The argument about the balance of payments is not mere rhetoric. Every year, through the 150-euro exemption, Chinese marketplaces Temu and AliExpress effectively compete with Ukrainian producers under unequal conditions: domestic business pays 20% VAT, imported small goods do not.

"Currently, through this exemption, the Ukrainian producer suffers. Because our producer pays 20% VAT, while the Chinese producer does not pay, and these goods are flowing massively into Ukraine. This is a distortion of competition and oppression of our Ukrainian producer".

Oleg Hetman, coordinator of expert groups at the Economic Expert Platform

The marketplaces, according to the draft law's design, will administer the tax and transfer it to the budget — not customs and not the customer at the post office.

Details that matter

  • Exemption threshold — only parcels up to 45 euros as personal gifts or items remain without VAT.
  • Marketplaces are required to provide a financial guarantee — equivalent to 100,000 euros — to obtain the right to a simplified administration procedure.
  • Transition year without administrative penalties for unintentional payment errors.
  • Date of entry into force — no earlier than January 1, 2027, by separate decision.
  • Adoption is a structural benchmark of the IMF Memorandum from February 13, 2026.

The draft law has already been approved by the relevant committee of the Council. According to estimates, the new model will bring approximately 10 billion hryvnias annually for the security and defense sector. The cumulative budget losses from this mechanism since the start of the full-scale invasion could exceed 43 billion hryvnias.

The question is not whether there will be VAT — it seems there will be. The question is whether marketplaces can handle the role of tax agent without gray schemes of splitting shipments, and whether 2027 will be a real start if the IMF does not change its priorities first.

```

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026