Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Finances

Elections costing 10 billion hryvnias: why Ukraine is asking partners and what it means

Organizing voting during wartime is significantly more expensive — we explain where the hundreds of millions come from, who evaluates the costs, and why this issue is about Ukraine's security and international support.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

January 21, 2026 · 2 min read

Elections costing 10 billion hryvnias: why Ukraine is asking partners and what it means

Organizing the elections as a matter of security and trust

The first deputy speaker of the parliament, Oleksandr Korniyenko, stated bluntly: organizing the upcoming elections under current conditions will cost "perhaps more than 10 billion hryvnias," and these expenditures should fall partly or entirely on the shoulders of international partners (interview with Noviny.LIVE). This is not just arithmetic — it is an issue that combines logistics, citizens' rights, and the international legitimacy of the results.

"These are billions of hryvnias. Ordinary elections used to cost us 2–3 billion… Now we're talking about perhaps more than 10 billion. It must be understood that partners should fully provide for this."

— Oleksandr Korniyenko, first deputy speaker of the Verkhovna Rada, head of the 'Servant of the People' party (Noviny.LIVE)

Why the cost has risen

The reasons are simple and at the same time complex. First, the scale of the challenges: according to officials' estimates, more than 4 million citizens are currently abroad — they must be given the opportunity to vote in various ways. Second, the destruction of infrastructure: different estimates cite figures from 2,000 to 6,000 polling stations that are damaged or destroyed. Third, inflation and higher costs for logistics, security, and payment for commission members — about 70% of expenses fall on the salaries of election commission members (estimates by the CEC).

Differences in estimates — what the different numbers mean

Estimates vary: Deputy Chair of the CEC Serhiy Dubovyk spoke of an amount of about UAH 20 billion including related expenses (interview with RBC-Ukraine), while Korniyenko mentions "over UAH 10 billion." The difference is partly due to methodology: whether to include all accompanying costs (logistics, information campaigns, security, international assistance) or only direct expenditures on polling stations and commissions. The type of election also matters — a baseline estimate for parliamentary or presidential elections differs significantly.

"Conducting the upcoming elections will cost at least UAH 20 billion when all accompanying expenses are taken into account."

— Serhiy Dubovyk, deputy chair of the CEC (RBC-Ukraine)

Who will pay and what the plan should be

The request for international financing is not a cry into the void but a practical calculation. Partners already fund security and humanitarian programs; ensuring electoral rights is a logical extension of that support and a marker of confidence in the restoration of democratic processes in Ukraine. But clear mechanisms are needed: transparent contracts, independent oversight, security guarantees for election commissions and citizens voting both in Ukraine and abroad.

Conclusion: elections as a test of statehood

Counting hryvnias is important, but even more important is the question of format and guarantees. The speed and transparency of agreements with partners will determine not only a budget line but also how the international community perceives the election results. Whether partners are ready to move from declarations to concrete financial and logistical steps is the key question for the coming months.

The ball is now in the court of those who speak about supporting democracy: will words turn into signed agreements and mechanisms that actually ensure every Ukrainian's right to vote?

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026