Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Finances

Shot Down a Drone — Received 100,000: How the Cabinet Restructured Funding for Civilian Air Defense

The government has amended Resolution No. 699 on voluntary civil defense groups: local authorities can now directly finance duty schedules, equipment, and payments without intermediaries in the form of state budget funds.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

May 21, 2026 · 2 min read

Shot Down a Drone — Received 100,000: How the Cabinet Restructured Funding for Civilian Air Defense
Ілюстративне фото: EPA / Maria Senovilla

The Cabinet of Ministers has changed the mechanism for voluntary air defense groups — units operating within voluntary formations of territorial communities (VFTC). The Defense Ministry initiative removes organizational barriers that have hindered network deployment since the launch of the experiment in June 2025.

What has changed in practice

Before the update, communities were essentially dependent on state transfers. Now local authorities can directly allocate local budget funds for: combat duty of personnel, purchase of strike unmanned aircraft, electronic warfare equipment, fuel and other supplies. According to the official Cabinet of Ministers website, the changes also detail requirements for personnel training.

In parallel, the mechanism for additional remuneration has been regulated: according to Ekonomichna Pravda, the basis for payment is a confirmed fact of hitting or destroying an air target. The base rate is up to 100,000 UAH per month proportional to the time spent on air defense activities; it is accrued by order of the commander of the Armed Forces of Ukraine unit at the request of the VFTC commander.

Who can join — and on what terms

The project is designed for volunteers who are not subject to mobilization, including reserved men. A contract is concluded for three years; applications should be made to the VFTC commander at the place of residence. Groups are subordinate to the Armed Forces of Ukraine Territorial Defense Forces, and for air defense tasks — to the Air Force Command.

"Air defense groups will be formed on a territorial basis. They will be subordinate to the commanders of the Territorial Defense Forces, and for air defense tasks — to the Air Force Command of the Armed Forces of Ukraine."

Ministry of Defense of Ukraine

Broader context: decentralization of defense

Resolution No. 699 of June 11, 2025 — the first link in a chain of regulatory changes. In July, the government launched a separate experiment No. 881 on radio-electronic protection of critical infrastructure facilities, and in November — Resolution No. 1506, which opened the door to the corporate sector: enterprises of critical infrastructure, regardless of ownership form, gained the right to create their own air defense groups.

The logic is obvious: the state distributes responsibility for the sky among the army, communities and business — not from an abundance of resources, but because of a lack of centralized capacity amid the growing number of strike drones.

The practical question that remains open: will local budgets have enough funds to actually deploy groups in small communities — places where the tax base is minimal, but drones fly as frequently as over regional centers?

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026