Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Finances

"Picasso Didn't Dare, Exter Did: NBU Mints Avant-Garde in Silver"

A coin featuring an artist who surpassed Picasso in boldness and left a Kyivan rhythm in Paris — the first in the National Bank of Ukraine's new numismatic series dedicated to avant-garde artists.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

May 23, 2026 · 3 min read

"Picasso Didn't Dare, Exter Did: NBU Mints Avant-Garde in Silver"
Фото: НБУ

When the National Bank issues a coin, it's usually not news. But when it features an artist who dared to become an abstract painter where Picasso, Braque, and Léger stopped — that's already a conversation about something more than numismatics.

An octagon as a manifesto

The NBU presented a commemorative coin "Ukrainian Avant-Garde. Oleksandra Ekster" — the first in a new series dedicated to Ukrainian avant-garde artists. The presentation took place during the opening of the exhibition "Avant-Garde Women" at the Museum of Avant-Garde — not in a bank hall, not at a press conference. The format itself already speaks to a different approach.

The commemorative coin with a face value of 10 hryvnia is made of 999 silver in the shape of an octagon — weighing 31.1 g, with a circulation up to 10,000 pieces, in the special uncirculated minting category. The obverse features a colored sketch of a theatrical costume for a Spanish dance by Ekster, while the reverse shows a stylized fragment of a theatrical stage as a reference to her scenography work. The design was created by artist Mykola Kovalenko and sculptor Anatoly Demyanenko. It can be purchased from June 2 in the NBU online store and from distributor banks.

Who is Ekster and why not "also"

Oleksandra Ekster was born in 1882 in Białystok and spent 35 years living in Kyiv, studying at the Kyiv Art School alongside Bohomazov and Archipenko. She later did what her Parisian friends did not dare to do: she became an abstract painter. She lived in four cities — Kyiv, Moscow, St. Petersburg, and Paris — and carried new ideas between them like contraband.

In Paris, she met Picasso, Braque, and Léger. But it was in Kyiv that she opened a studio that became the center of Ukrainian avant-garde — where painters, writers, poets, and musicians would gather. Later, her innovations in theatrical design were adopted in Europe and America. Together with the founders of art deco style, she shaped the visual language of an entire era.

"Oleksandra Ekster found no place in the empire — and she brought Ukrainian context, rhythm, and colors to European culture"

— NBU Governor Andrii Pyshnyi at the coin presentation

Why this for the NBU — and why for us

The regulator frankly articulates its goal: to prove that Ukrainian culture was self-sufficient long before any "common space" with the empire. The avant-garde series is not the NBU's first similar initiative; a coin program dedicated to art has existed since 2005, but this new direction focused on avant-gardists is a separate conceptual step.

There is also a practical dimension: in times when discussions about cultural restitution and reattribution are ongoing, a coin is cheaper than a court case but more tangible than an academic article. Ten thousand physical objects bearing a Kyiv name — in wallets, display cases, collections.

  • Form: octagon — a departure from the standard circle, referencing the geometric nature of avant-garde
  • Image: theatrical costume rather than a portrait — emphasizing the work, not the person
  • Context of issue: the "Avant-Garde Women" exhibition, meaning a conscious connection to a broader cultural moment

The question that remains open: if the NBU is truly building a series rather than a one-time action — who comes next in line and will there be enough institutional consistency to see it through when budgetary pressure increases?

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026